OCT- versus Scheimpflug-based Total Corneal Power Measurements Changes in Myopic Astigmatic SMILE Procedures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of total keratometry (TK) to estimate corneal power in eyes that underwent SMILE for treatment of myopia or myopic astigmatism in subgroups of low and high astigmatism. METHODS: The difference between preoperative and postoperative measurements of corneal power (ΔTCRP, ΔTK) was compared with the surgically induced refractive change at the corneal plane (ΔSEco) by Pearson correlation. Vector analysis of TCRP- and TK-derived astigmatism was performed to evaluate the corneal astigmatism. Single-angle plots were generated with the AstigMATIC tool for standard astigmatism vector analysis. RESULTS: Paired t-test revealed statistically significant differences in preoperative (p = .02) and postoperative (p = .0455) measurements between TK and TCRP in the group of high-level astigmatism and the postoperative low astigmatism group (p < .01). No significant differences were found in preoperative data in the group of low-level astigmatism (p = .60). The correlation of ΔSEco and TK (low astigmatism, R2 = 0.978; high astigmatism R2 = 0.980) was stronger than the correlation of TCRP 4.0 mm and ΔSEco (low astigmatism, R2 = 0.743; high astigmatism R2 = 0.959) in both astigmatic groups. The vector analysis demonstrated nearly identical results concerning the correction index (CI) for TK and TCRP. Comparing the difference vector (DV) between both parameters, TK-derived results were closer to the optimum. CONCLUSIONS: The findings endorse TK as a reliable measure of corneal power after SMILE in patients with low and high astigmatism.

Comparison of changes in corneal volume and corneal thickness after myopia correction between LASIK and SMILE.

Myopia is the most common refractive error. Surgical correction with laser is possible. LASIK and SMILE are the techniques currently most used. Aim of the study was to compare changes in corneal volume and thickness after the respective laser treatment. 104 eyes of 52 patients were matched based on refractive error into two equally sized groups, either treated with LASIK or SMILE. Measurements were obtained from the Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam) preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. 3 months postoperatively, the flapless SMILE procedure resulted in a significant overall greater loss of corneal volume (P < 0.01) and corneal thickness (P < 0.01) compared to LASIK. No significant difference was found when comparing the 3 to 12-months values in each group. Within the currently used ranges of refractive error correction, loss in central corneal thickness and corneal volume with SMILE is higher in comparison to LASIK. As greater loss in corneal volume and thickness might contribute to higher level of corneal instability maximum ranges of refractive error correction with SMILE should not supersede those set currently for LASIK until more long-term results on corneal ectasia are available for SMILE.

Total keratometry for determination of true corneal power after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To gauge the value of total keratometry (TK) to estimate corneal power change in eyes that underwent small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for treatment of myopia or myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, and SMILE Eyes Clinic Munich Airport, Munich, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional trial. METHODS: A total of 40 eyes of 40 patients who had undergone myopic SMILE were enrolled in this prospective study. Total corneal refractive power (TCRP; Pentacam HR) and TK (IOLMaster 700, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) values were compared with the clinical history method (CHM). The surgically induced changes in TCRP (ΔTCRP) and TK (ΔTK) were also compared with the changes in spherical equivalent on the corneal plane (ΔSEco). RESULTS: Of the 40 eyes analyzed, the correlation between TK and CHM (R2 = 0.91, P < .001) was stronger than that between TCRP and CHM (R2 = 0.87, P < .001). When compared with the CHM, TCRP underestimated corneal power by a mean relative error of 0.59 diopter (D) and TK by 0.17 D. Linear regression analysis of ΔTCRP/ΔTK and the difference between preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent at the corneal plane (ΔSEco) showed stronger correlation in ΔTK (R2 = 0.88) than that in ΔTCRP (R2 = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The findings endorse TK as an accurate measure for corneal power after myopic SMILE.

[SMILE - Small Incision Lenticule Extraction]. / SMILE ­ Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

Refractive lenticule extraction is a corneal surgical technique that uses a femtosecond laser exclusively to create an intrastromal refractive lenticule for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. In small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) the generated refractive lenticule is subsequently extracted through a small incision. The reported efficacy, predictability and safety of the flap-less SMILE procedure is similar to those of femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Advantages of SMILE over LASIK include less iatrogenic dry eye, fewer induced higher-order aberrations, and potentially less biomechanical weakening of the cornea. However, there is a steeper surgeon learning curve for SMILE as the procedure is technically more challenging than LASIK. Furthermore, the current SMILE laser platform cannot use cyclotorsion control or eye-tracking technology and retreatment options are more complex compared to LASIK. This review looks at patient selection, surgical method, possible complications, retreatment options, and postoperative outcome of the SMILE technique.

[Enhancements after Refractive Corneal Surgery]. / Refraktive Hornhautchirurgie: Nachkorrekturen.

This review article focusses on the management of enhancements after corneal refractive laser surgery. Fundamental issues regarding enhancement embrace identification of the underlying reason for postoperative ametropia, assurance of stability of refraction, type of primary refractive laser treatment and thorough evaluation of the given anatomical parameters of the cornea. With respect to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, different surgical options for enhancement strategies are displayed with their particular advantages and disadvantages including preoperative planning of the according laser parameters and postoperative patient management.

Surface Ablation Versus CIRCLE for Myopic Enhancement After SMILE: A Matched Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of enhancement after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using surface ablation versus the VisuMax CIRCLE option (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), which converts the SMILE cap into a femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis flap. METHODS: The databases of the SMILE Eyes centers in Munich, Marburg, and Cologne, Germany, and Linz, Austria, were screened for eyes that had undergone enhancement using surface ablation with mitomycin C or CIRCLE. Eyes from both enhancement methods suitable for a retrospective matched analysis were identified based on pre-SMILE and pre-enhancement mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), astigmatism, age, and corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA/UDVA). Refractive and functional outcomes were compared after a follow-up of 3 months. RESULTS: After the application of the matching criteria on 2,803 SMILE procedures, 24 eyes (12 in each group) with a follow-up of 3 months or longer were available for analysis. Enhancement was performed after a mean 9.7 ± 7.2 (surface ablation) and 11.0 ± 4.4 (CIRCLE) months for a residual MRSE of -0.91 ± 0.55 (surface ablation) and -0.90 ± 0.61 (CIRCLE) diopters. At 3 months, residual MRSE showed comparable accuracy with -0.07 ± 0.19 (surface ablation) and 0.04 ± 0.22 (CIRCLE) diopters (P = .18). UDVA improvement was similar to a final value of 0.02 ± 0.10 (surface ablation) versus 0.03 ± 0.07 (CIRCLE) logMAR (P = .78). Only one eye in the surface ablation group and no eye in the CIRCLE group lost one line of CDVA. At 3 months, the safety (surface ablation: 1.00, CIRCLE: 1.06; P = .36) and efficacy (surface ablation: 0.95, CIRCLE: 1.03; P = .36) indices were equivalent. In terms of speed of visual recovery, at week 1 UDVA and CDVA were significantly better after CIRCLE than surface ablation (P = .008 and .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this first study directly comparing surface ablation versus CIRCLE enhancement after SMILE, both methods yielded comparable results at 3 months. However, CIRCLE re-treated eyes showed a markedly increased speed of recovery concerning UDVA and CDVA compared to surface ablation. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(5):294-300.].

Secondary intraocular lens implantation: a large retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate preoperative ocular risk factors and indications for secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and compare postoperative complications, visual and refractive outcomes in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Patients older than 14 years that underwent secondary IOL implantation and had a minimum follow-up of 3 months were enrolled in this retrospective case series. Preoperative ocular risk factors, indications for surgery, postoperative complications, and visual and refractive outcomes including prediction error (PE) and absolute error (AE) were evaluated. IOLs were fixated in following positions: anterior chamber (AC), retropupillary iris-claw (IC), sulcus, and capsular bag or sclera. RESULTS: One-hundred eighty-two eyes of 174 patients with mean follow-up of 17 ± 13.6 months were evaluated. Leading cause for surgery was IOL dislocation (75%), followed by secondary aphakia (19%) and IOL opacifications (6%). Previous vitrectomy was the major preoperative ocular risk factor (43%). Mean corrected distance visual acuity improved from preoperative 0.68 ± 0.55 to 0.42 ± 0.31LogMAR by the last follow-up (p = 0.001). PE and AE differed highly depending on the indication for surgery (p = 0.041 and p = 0.008, respectively) and the IOL fixation (p = 0.011 and p = 0.028, respectively), with IC-IOLs showing the lowest PE and AE. Postoperative AC-hemorrhage occurred mainly after IC-IOLs (p = 0.003), and postoperative hypotony was significantly higher in eyes with previous uveitis (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Previous vitrectomy seems to be a major underreported risk factor in eyes that undergo secondary IOL implantation. Refractive outcomes depend on indication for surgery and fixation type, with retropupillary IC-IOLs providing the best refractive results, though not statistically significant compared to other IOL positions.

Impact of a Displaced Corneal Apex in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possible impact of a displaced corneal apex (point of maximum curvature) on visual results and tomographic parameters after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: In this retrospective evaluation, eyes with uncomplicated SMILE for myopia correction were classified in two groups based on their preoperative distance between the corneal apex and corneal vertex (corneal intercept with the patient's line of sight) of 1 mm or greater (large A-V distance) or less than 1 mm (small A-V distance). All surgeries were performed during the early learning curve of two surgeons. Visual outcome parameters included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), and refractive astigmatism 3 months postoperatively. Scheimpflug-derived tomographic outcome parameters included mean keratometry value, root mean square higher order aberrations (RMS HOAs), and optical zone decentration. RESULTS: The study comprised 94 eyes of 48 patients: 44 eyes in the large A-V distance group and 50 eyes in the small A-V distance group. Preoperative and postoperative RMS HOAs were significantly higher in the large A-V distance group than in the small A-V distance group (P = .002 and .008, respectively). Postoperative CDVA was significantly better in the small A-V distance group (P = .014). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative UDVA, MRSE, refractive astigmatism, mean keratometry value, and optical zone decentration. CONCLUSIONS: After SMILE, CDVA was significantly worse in eyes with a preoperatively displaced corneal apex compared to eyes with a more central corneal apex. However, good visual results were achieved in both groups. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(7):460-465.].

Influence of total intraocular lens diameter on efficacy and safety for in the bag cataract surgery.

CONTEXT: Intraocular lenses with variable total diameter are supposed to fit better in the capsular bag and lead to fewer complications. AIMS: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and the safety of an intraocular lens model with variable total diameter. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective randomized intraindividual study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two eyes of sixteen patients with bilateral age-related cataract received standard cataract surgery with implantation of an intraocular lens with a standard diameter in one eye (Quatrix®, Group A) and with a variable total diameter in the fellow eye (Quatrix Evolutive®, Group B). Primary study endpoints included evaluation of refraction stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) over a follow-up period of 6 months. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: SPSS (Version 19.0) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity after 6 months were 0.24 and 0.1 LogMAR in Group A and 0.23 and 0.09 LogMAR in Group B, respectively. The objective and manifest spherical equivalent (OSE, MSE) 6 months postoperatively were + 0.65 D and + 0.62 D in Group A compared to + 0.33 D and + 0.33 D in Group B respectively (P = 0.665 for OSE, P = 0.208 for MSE). PCO-index increased statistically significant in both groups (P = 0.004 in Group A, P = 0.046 in Group B), but the difference of PCO-index between both groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.569). CONCLUSIONS: An intraocular lens with a variable total diameter shows good visual outcomes and safety performance as well as same outcomes concerning postoperative refractive stability and development of PCO compared to an intraocular lens with standard total diameter.

Wound Healing, Inflammation, and Corneal Ultrastructure After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK: A Human Ex Vivo Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the wound healing, inflammation, and tissue ultrastructure in the human corneal stroma after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK). METHODS: Sixteen corneoscleral discs of 16 human donors unsuitable for corneal transplantation were obtained from an eye bank. Eight eyes underwent SMILE with -5.00 diopters (D) of myopic correction; in 3 of them the lenticule was not extracted. Further 5 donor corneas were subjected to FS-LASIK with -5.00 D ablation, and 3 eyes served as the control group without surgical intervention. Postoperatively, specimens were incubated in organ culture medium for 72 hours before being subjected to immunofluorescence staining for CD11b, Ki67, fibronectin, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-digoxigenin nick-end labelling assay, and high-magnification scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Keratocyte apoptosis, keratocyte proliferation, and infiltration of immune cells were generally mild and comparable between FS-LASIK and SMILE (irrespective of surgical lenticule extraction). By staining for fibronectin, we observed a trend toward milder fibrotic response in the corneal stroma after SMILE than after FS-LASIK. On the contrary, scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed a smoother, more regular ultrastructural appearance of the residual corneal bed after FS-LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal stromal wound healing after SMILE and FS-LASIK was virtually identical with respect to keratocyte proliferation and apoptosis in the human donor eye model. Although reactive fibrosis adjacent to the laser application site appeared less marked after SMILE, the stromal bed after LASIK exhibited a smoother surface texture. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(6):393-399.].

CIRCLE Enhancement After Myopic SMILE.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of enhancement after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using the VisuMax CIRCLE option (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), which converts the SMILE cap into a femtosecond LASIK flap for secondary excimer laser application. METHODS: Of 2,065 SMILE procedures, 22 eyes (1.1%) re-treated with CIRCLE with a follow-up of 3 months were included in the analysis. SMILE was performed in the usual manner. For re-treatment, the CIRCLE procedure was performed with pattern D flap creation on the VisuMax system and subsequent excimer laser ablation with a Zeiss MEL 90 laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) with plano target in all cases. RESULTS: Spherical equivalent was -5.56 ± 2.22 diopters (D) before SMILE and -0.51 ± 1.08 D before CIRCLE. CIRCLE enhancement was performed after a mean of 10.0 ± 7.9 months, allowed for safe flap lifting in all eyes, and resulted in a final manifest refraction spherical equivalent of 0.18 ± 0.31 D at 3 months (P < .008). The number of eyes within 0.50 and 1.00 D from target refraction increased from 31.8% to 90.9% and from 77.3% to 100%, respectively. Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) had already improved from 0.37 ± 0.16 to 0.08 ± 0.16 logMAR at 1 week (P < .0001), resulting in 0.03 ± 0.07 logMAR at 3 months (P < .0001). All eyes gained at least one line of UDVA. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) remained unchanged at all time points (before vs after CIRCLE, P = .40). Two eyes (9.1 %) lost one line of CDVA; no eye lost two or more lines. The safety and efficacy indices were 1.03 and 0.97 at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The CIRCLE procedure represents an effective re-treatment option after SMILE. Compared to surface ablation re-treatment after SMILE, CIRCLE seems to offer advantages in respect to speed of visual recovery, safety, and predictability, but at the price of flap creation. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(5):304-309.].

Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To compare a biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) algorithm provided by the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (Corvis ST) with Goldmann applanation tonometry IOP (Goldmann IOP) and standard dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer IOP measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and refractive lenticule extraction small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgeries. SETTING: Smile Eye Clinic, Munich, Germany, and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Patients scheduled for LASIK and patients scheduled for small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia or myopic astigmatism were included. The preoperative and postoperative evaluations included Goldmann, Scheimpflug tomography, and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer IOP measurements. RESULTS: The study comprised 14 patients in the LASIK group and 22 patients in the small-incision lenticule extraction group. Preoperative Goldmann IOP and Scheimpflug analyzer IOP values showed significant positive correlation with central corneal thickness (CCT) (P = .05 for LASIK; P = .003 for small-incision lenticule extraction). No significant correlation was found between bIOP and CCT (P > .05). After both surgeries, there were significant decreases in Goldmann IOP (-3.2 mm Hg ± 3.4 [SD] and -3.2 ± 2.1 mm Hg, respectively; both P < .001) and Scheimpflug analyzer IOP (-3.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg and -3.3 ± 2.0 mm Hg, respectively, both P < .001) compared with preoperative readings, whereas bIOP did not differ significantly (0.1 ± 2.1 mm Hg and 0.8 ± 1.8 mm Hg, respectively; P = .80 and P = .273, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The bIOP readings before and after LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction were neither significantly different nor correlated with CCT. In contrast, both Goldmann IOP and Scheimpflug analyzer IOP had significant reductions postoperatively and showed significant correlation with CCT preoperatively.

Corneal Densitometry after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

PURPOSE: To compare corneal densitometry values after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) using Scheimpflug Imaging. METHODS: Our retrospective clinical trial included a total of 146 eyes where 57 eyes underwent Fs-LASIK and 89 eyes underwent SMILE. Examinations with a Pentacam Scheimpflug device (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) were performed before surgery, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Detailed data of all four concentric optical zones were acquired - central 0-2 mm, 2-6 mm, 6-10 mm and 10-12 mm. The cornea was divided into anterior 120 µm, middle and posterior 60 µm sections. Values were analyzed during follow-up comparing Fs-LASIK and SMILE. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in corneal density were detected. The central 0-2 mm anterior area demonstrated a mean 1-year value of 17.99 grayscale units (GSU) ± 0.89 (range 16.60-19.50) after Fs-LASIK versus 17.96 GSU ± 0.98 (range 16.40-20.00) after SMILE. Three months after surgery there was a slight temporary density increase in the 6-10 mm anterior annulus in the LASIK group - 22.19 (SD = 3.99, range: 15.60-30.50) compared to SMILE - 20.39 (SD = 3.79, range 14.70-36.30). CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant short or long-term differences in postoperative corneal densitometry after LASIK and SMILE, demonstrating SMILE is not inferior in this regard. Known delayed visual acuity recovery after SMILE in relation to LASIK could not be correlated with changes in corneal density.

Long-term database analysis of conventional and accelerated crosslinked keratoconic mid-European eyes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term efficacy of accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in a large mid-European cohort with progressive keratoconus. METHODS: Four hundred thirteen eyes of 316 patients with progressive keratoconus were enrolled and treated with conventional (group A) or accelerated (group B) CXL. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), slit lamp, and Pentacam® examinations were performed before and 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. Maximum and mean anterior keratometry (Kmax, Kmf), corneal topography indices, and corneal pachymetry (TCT) were examined within each group and between groups. Further subgroup analysis of mild and moderate keratoconic eyes was performed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one eyes of 101 patients were treated in group A, 282 eyes of 215 patients in group B. (UDVA, CDVA) and Kmax improved within each group, but not statistically significantly between groups after 36 months (p = 0.081, p = 0.344, p = 0.113, respectively). Kmf remained stable in both groups. TCT decreased significantly in group A (p = 0.014), but remained stable in group B (p = 0.063). Subgroup analysis showed similar results with improvement in visual acuity and keratometry and decrease of TCT. Corneal topography indices showed no differences between the groups after 36 months, but developed differently in the subgroup analysis. No correlation was detected between the change of corneal topography indices and TCT with regard to preoperative Kmax. CONCLUSION: In a large mid-European study population including subgroup analysis of mild and moderate keratoconus, accelerated CXL showed similar results to conventional CXL regarding keratometry, corneal topography indices, and CDVA, but further improvement of UDVA. Preoperative Kmax did not affect the postoperative course of corneal topography indices and TCT.

Comparison of visual outcomes, alignment accuracy, and surgical time between 2 methods of corneal marking for toric intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of a computer-assisted marker system for toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) (Callisto Eye System) with manual marking techniques. SETTING: University Eye Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: This study included patients having cataract surgery with implantation of a toric IOL (Torbi 709 M). They were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups based on the marking system used, manual or digital. Patients were included if they had age-related cataract and a regular corneal astigmatism of 1.25 diopters (D) or higher. Visual and refractive outcomes as well as rotational stability were evaluated. Vector analysis was performed to evaluate total astigmatic changes. RESULTS: The study comprised 57 eyes of 29 patients; there were 28 eyes in the manual group and 29 eyes in the digital group. The mean toric IOL misalignment was significantly lower in the digital group than in the manual group (2.0 degrees ± 1.86 [SD] versus 3.4 ± 2.37 degrees; P = .026). The mean deviation from the target induced astigmatism was significantly lower in the digital group (0.10 ± 0.08 D versus 0.22 ± 0.14 D; P = .008). During surgery, the mean toric IOL alignment time was significantly shorter in the digital group (37.2 ± 11.9 seconds versus 59.4 ± 15.3 seconds; P = .003). The mean overall time required to perform the surgery was significantly shorter in the digital group (727.2 ± 198.4 seconds versus 1110.0 ± 382.2 seconds; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A digital tracking approach for toric IOL alignment was efficient and safe to improve refractive outcomes. Furthermore, image-guided surgery helped streamline the workflow in refractive cataract surgery.

Enhancement After Myopic Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Surface Ablation.

PURPOSE: To report the feasibility and outcomes of surface ablation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: In this retrospective evaluation of 1,963 SMILE procedures, 43 eyes (2.2%) were re-treated at three separate clinics. Of these, 40 eyes of 28 patients with a follow-up of at least 3 months were included in the analysis. During surface ablation, mitomycin C was applied for haze prevention. RESULTS: Spherical equivalent was -6.35 ± 1.31 diopters (D) before SMILE and -0.86 ± 0.43 D before surface ablation. Surface ablation was performed after a mean of 9.82 ± 5.27 months and resulted in a spherical equivalent of 0.03 ± 0.57 D at 3 months (P < .0001). The number of patients within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D of target refraction increased from 22.5% to 80% and from 72.5% to 92.5%, respectively. Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved from 0.23 ± 0.20 to 0.08 ± 0.15 logMAR (P < .0001); 65% of patients gained at least one line. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) remained unchanged with 0.01 ± 0.07 logMAR before versus -0.01 ± 0.05 logMAR after re-treatment (P = .99). Six eyes (15.0%) lost one line of CDVA, but final CDVA was 0.00 logMAR in four and 0.10 logMAR in two of these cases. The safety and efficacy indices were 1.06 and 0.90 at 3 months, respectively. Three of the four surface ablation profiles (Triple-A, tissue-saving algorithm, and topography-guided) resulted in equally good results, whereas enhancement with the aspherically optimized profile (ASA), used in two eyes, resulted in overcorrection (+1.38 and +1.75 D). CONCLUSIONS: Combined with the intraoperative application of mitomycin C, surface ablation seems to be a safe and effective method of secondary enhancement after SMILE. Due to the usually low residual myopia, the ASA profile is not recommended in these cases. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(8):513-518.].

Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery on posterior capsule opacification in the human capsular bag in vitro.

PURPOSE: To compare posterior capsule opacification (PCO) by observing lens epithelial cell growth in the human capsular bag in vitro between conventional lens surgery using phacoemulsification (Phaco) technique and femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery (FLACS). METHODS: For the in vitro human capsular bag model, 18 cadaver eyes from nine human donors underwent three types of lens surgery. Three groups consisting of six capsular bags were established, that is FLACS, Phaco and extracapsular lens extraction (ECCE). The capsular bag was transferred into equal cell culture conditions after using one of the defined surgical approaches. Cellular growth of lens epithelial cells was observed and photo-documented. The time until full cell-coverage of the capsular bag was measured. RESULTS: The human capsular bag model can be successfully prepared using FLACS. There was no statistically significant difference in time until cell-coverage of the human donor capsular bag in vitro in all three surgical settings (ECCE versus Phaco p = 0.6; ECCE versus FLACS p = 1.0; Phaco versus FLACS p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In our in vitro human capsular bag model, we could not observe a statistically significant difference in PCO formation using different surgical approaches of lens extraction. Therefore, PCO formation might not be attributed to the type of surgery. Furthermore, this study shows that FLACS can be used for the human capsular bag model preparation and validates the human capsular bag model for future research.

Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: This study uses numerical analysis and validation against clinical data to develop a method to correct intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the Corvis Tonometer for the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), and age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Finite element analysis was conducted to simulate the effect of tonometric air pressure on the intact eye globe. The analyses considered eyes with wide variations in IOP (10-30 mm Hg), CCT (445-645 microns), R (7.2-8.4 mm), shape factor, P (0.6-1) and age (30-90 years). In each case, corneal deformation was predicted and used to estimate the IOP measurement by Corvis (CVS-IOP). Analysis of the results led to an algorithm relating estimates of true IOP as a function of CVS-IOP, CCT and age. All other parameters had negligible effect on CVS-IOP and have therefore been omitted from the algorithm. Predictions of corrected CVS-IOP, as obtained by applying the algorithm to a clinical data-set involving 634 eyes, were assessed for their association with the cornea stiffness parameters; CCT and age. RESULTS: Analysis of CVS-IOP measurements within the 634-large clinical data-set showed strong correlation with CCT (3.06 mm Hg/100 microns, r(2) = 0.204) and weaker correlation with age (0.24 mm Hg/decade, r(2) = 0.009). Applying the algorithm to IOP measurements resulted in IOP estimations that became less correlated with both CCT (0.04 mm Hg/100 microns, r(2) = 0.005) and age (0.09 mm Hg/decade, r(2) = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The IOP correction process developed in this study was successful in reducing reliance of IOP measurements on both corneal thickness and age in a healthy European population.

Comparing Different Decontamination Procedures in Harvesting Human Donor Cornea.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of current hygiene standards for the enucleation of postmortem eyes by investigating the number of microorganisms during subsequent steps of decontamination and tissue processing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized cohort study includes 184 postmortem eyes of 92 human donors. Enucleation was performed, according to an ophthalmic surgical procedure. Two groups were generated as follows: right eyes were allocated to group A, left eyes were allocated to group B. In group A, a mucosal disinfectant was used accessorily. Conjunctival smears were taken to examine germ load in both groups before any intervention, in group A after mucosal disinfection, in both groups after transportation of the whole globes in transport fluid, and in both groups after a bath in 0.75% povidone iodine solution for at least 3 minutes just before preparation of the corneoscleral disc. Smears were sent to the local microbiologic laboratory in an aseptic package for testing. RESULTS: All smears showed multiple contaminations (n = 184/184 eyes) before treatment with povidone iodine solution. Contamination was in both groups significantly prevented using the treatment strategy of an at least 3-minute bath in 0.75% povidone iodine solution (n = 1/184 eyes; p < 0.01) As a side effect, almost every eye of group A and none of group B showed brown iodine staining corresponding to corneal epithelial erosion. CONCLUSIONS: An aseptic setting for donor enucleation similar to a surgical procedure seems not to influence the outcome of germ colonization. The most effective step to decontaminate donor eyes is to use 0.75% povidone iodine solution for at least 3 minutes.

Evaluation of Changes in Human Corneas After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Non-Contact Tonometry and Ultra-High-Speed Camera (Corvis ST).

PURPOSE: To evaluate theoretical biomechanical advantages of human corneas treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) compared with femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) Patients and methods: In a prospective, comparative, non-randomized, consecutive case series patients with moderate to high myopia and/or astigmatism underwent corneal refractive surgery. Patients either received standard FS-LASIK or SMILE. Preoperatively and up to 3 months postoperatively data were analyzed including tomography with Pentacam HR, Goldmann tonometry, non-contact tonometry, and deformability of the cornea using an ultra-high-speed camera (Corvis ST). Data were analyzed and p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant (t-test). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (128 eyes) were treated. Forty-eight eyes of 29 patients underwent FS-LASIK and 80 eyes of 44 patients underwent SMILE. Preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -3.23 ± 1.64 D (FS-LASIK group) and -4.83 ± 1.63 D (SMILE group) (p < 0.0001). Almost all parameters obtained by Corvis ST between preoperative and postoperative measurements showed significant changes after refractive surgery. Significant changes were seen between both groups postoperatively. However, matched pair subgroup analysis (n = 69; 26 eyes FS-LASIK; 43 eyes SMILE) of eyes with initially equal pachymetry, intraocular pressure, SE, and difference of pre- to postoperative pachymetry (p>0.05), showed no significant changes in parameters measured with Corvis ST (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal biomechanical parameters measured preoperatively with Corvis ST showed significant differences postoperatively in total and in both groups. In subgroup analysis with homogenous groups, FS-LASIK showed no significant changes in biomechanical data measured with Corvis ST compared with SMILE.